UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Schedule 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

Commission file number 000-33067

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

MIDWEST ENERGY EMISSIONS CORP.

500 W. Wilson Bridge Rd, Suite 140

Worthington, Ohio 43085

____________

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 18, 2014

____________

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS:

You are hereby notified that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Midwest Energy Emissions Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the Energy & Environmental Research Center, 15 N. 23rd St., Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202, on Tuesday, November 18, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, for the following purposes:

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on October 17, 2014 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2014:

This proxy statement and the Company’s 2013 annual report to shareholders are also available at http://www.midwestemissions.com/meeting-access/

SHAREHOLDERS WHO DO NOT EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON ARE URGED TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET OR TO COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE TO ENSURE THAT THEIR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF.

MIDWEST ENERGY EMISSIONS CORP

500 W. Wilson Bridge Rd, Suite 140

Worthington, Ohio 43085

____________________

PROXY STATEMENT

____________________

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the Board of Directors of Midwest Energy Emissions Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the Energy & Environmental Research Center, 15 N. 23rd St., Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202, on Tuesday, November 18, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, and at any adjournment thereof.

This proxy statement and accompanying notice and form of proxy are being mailed to shareholders on or about October 27, 2014. A copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders, including financial statements, for the fiscal year December 31, 2013 (the “2013 fiscal year”) is enclosed with this proxy statement.

The presence of any shareholder at the Annual Meeting will not operate to revoke his proxy. Any proxy may be revoked, at any time before it is exercised, in open meeting, or by giving notice to the Company in writing, or by filing a duly executed proxy bearing a later date.

The holders of shares of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the record date, present in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business to be considered at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes and abstaining votes will be counted as “present” for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been achieved at the meeting, but will not be counted in favor of or against any director nominee. The voting standards for each of the other known matters to be considered at the meeting are set forth within the proposals.

If the enclosed proxy is executed and returned to the Company, the persons named therein will vote the shares represented by it at the Annual Meeting. The proxy permits specification of a vote for the election of directors, or the withholding of authority to vote in the election of directors, or the withholding of authority to vote for one or more specified nominees and a vote for, against or abstain on the other proposals described in this proxy statement. Where a choice is specified in the proxy, the shares of common stock represented thereby will be voted in accordance with such specification. If no specification is made, such shares will be voted to elect as directors the nominees set forth herein under “Election of Directors” and FOR the other proposals (for one year on the say-on-pay frequency proposal) included in this proxy.

The close of business on October 17, 2014 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of October 17, 2014, the Company’s outstanding voting securities consisted of 40,228,123 shares of common stock, with par value of $0.001, each of which is entitled to one vote on all matters to be presented to the shareholders at the Annual Meeting.

VOTING PROCEDURES

If you are a record holder:

If you are a “street name” holder:

ANNUAL REPORT; INTERNET AVAILABILITY

A copy of our Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2013 is enclosed with this Proxy Statement. Additional, this proxy Statement and our Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2013 are available at http://www.midwestemissions.com/meeting-access/.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the Annual Meeting, shares represented by proxies will be voted, unless otherwise specified in such proxies, for the election of the five nominees to the Board of Directors named in this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy. These nominees were selected by the Board of Directors and will, if elected, serve as directors of the Company until the next Annual Meeting of the shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier removal or resignation. All of the nominees are currently members of the Board of Directors and all nominees have consented to be nominated and to serve if elected. If, for any reason, any one or more nominees become unavailable for election, it is expected that proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute nominees as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The director nominees who receive the greatest number of affirmative votes will be elected.

Nominees to serve for the One-Year Term expiring in 2015:

The Board of Directors recommends that the Shareholders vote FOR the nominees.

In addition to the professional and occupational experience described above for each nominee, the Board has concluded that the skills, qualifications, experiences and attributes described below make the nominees persons who should serve as directors:

Johnny F. Norris, Jr. – Mr. Norris has decades of demonstrated experience at the senior executive level. He has an industry-proven ability in successfully building new services companies. Mr. Norris has many years of significant public company experience, and has been instrumental in managing over a dozen successful mergers and acquisitions in his career. His experience includes both COO and CEO positions at mid-size companies, as well as senior executive positions in major corporations with direct operational responsibility of tens of billions of dollars in assets, billions of dollars in annual revenues, and over 8,000 employees.

Richard A. MacPherson – Mr. MacPherson has worked with industry leading scientists and engineers to bring the Company’s technology from the R&D phase, through multiple product development stages, to the final commercialization phase, acting as the lead on all required initiatives and activities.

Jay Rifkin – Mr. Rifkin is a successful media executive who founded Mojo Music, Inc., a music publishing company, in 1995 and has been President since it was founded. Mr. Rifkin has served as Producer and Executive Producer on various motion pictures and is also a music producer, engineer and songwriter. From 1988 to 2004, Mr. Rifkin, through Mojo Music, Inc., served as a Managing Member of Media Ventures, LLC, an entertainment cooperative founded by Mr. Rifkin and composer Hans Zimmer. In 1995 Mr. Rifkin founded Mojo Records, LLC, which in 1996 became a joint venture with Universal Records, and was subsequently sold to Zomba/BMG Records in 2001.

R. Alan Kelley – Mr. Kelley has many years of extensive public company experience as well as demonstrated success in multiple “turnarounds” of underperforming businesses. In addition, Mr. Kelley has international experience in developing and implementing return-on-investment regulatory structures. Mr. Kelley was Chairman of the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Generation Committee, whose members represent over half of the generating facilities nationally and Chairman of the Mid-America Interconnected Network Regional Reliability Council. He is a former member of the Board of Directors of the North American Electric Reliability Council.

Christopher Greenberg – Mr. Greenberg is a dedicated and technically-skilled business professional with a versatile skill set developed through experience as an entrepreneur, business developer and community leader. Currently Mr. Greenberg is the CEO of Global Safety Network and owner of Express Employment Professionals (Grand Forks, Fargo, Minot, North Dakota, Aberdeen and Watertown, South Dakota and Tampa, Florida). A highly-experienced Operations Executive who has demonstrated the ability to lead diverse teams of professionals to new levels of success in a variety of highly-competitive industries, cutting-edge markets, and fast-paced environments. Mr. Greenberg has strong technical and business qualifications with an impressive track record of more than 19 years of hands-on experience in strategic planning, business unit development, project and product management, and proprietary software development. He also has the proven ability to successfully analyze an organization’s critical business requirements, identify deficiencies and potential opportunities, and develop innovative and cost-effective solutions for enhancing competitiveness, increasing revenues, and improving customer service offerings.

Board Leadership

The Board does not have a formal policy regarding the separation of the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes it is in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. At this time, the Board has determined that separating the role of Chairman from the role of CEO is in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders. This structure permits our President and CEO to devote more time to focus on the strategic direction and management of our day-to-day operations. Currently the Board has one independent director, Mr. Greenberg.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board of Directors’ attention the most material risks to the Company. The Board of Directors has oversight responsibility of the processes established to report and monitor systems for material risks applicable to the Company. The full Board regularly reviews enterprise-wide risk management, which includes treasury risks, financial and accounting risks, legal and compliance risks and other risk management functions. The full Board considers risks related to the attraction and retention of talent and related to the design of compensation programs tailored to the specific needs of the Company. The full Board considers strategic risks and opportunities and receives reports from management on risk.

Board of Directors Structure

The Board of Directors has determined that Christopher Greenberg is an “independent director” as defined by the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market.

The full Board of Directors acts as an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. In addition, the Company’s Board of Directors does not have a Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors as a whole functions as the Nominating Committee due to the relatively small size of the Board and the smaller market capitalization of the Company. Therefore, the Board does not have any committee charters.

The full Board of Directors acts as the Audit Committee and approves the Company’s retention of independent auditors and pre-approves any audit or non-audit services performed by them. It reviews with such accountants the arrangements for, and the scope of, the audit to be conducted by them. It also reviews with the independent accountants and with management the results of audits and various other financial and accounting matters affecting the Company.

The Board of Directors acts as the Compensation Committee and administers the Company’s compensation, benefits and the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. Our policies and overall compensation practices for all employees do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, incentive compensation (in the past generally in the form of stock options) is not designed to create, and does not create, risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Recommendations regarding compensation of officers (other than the CEO) are made to the full Board by our CEO. The Board of Directors can exercise its discretion in modifying any amount presented by our CEO. During fiscal 2013 the Board of Directors did not retain the services of a compensation consultant.

The Board of Directors met 14 times during the 2013. Each director currently serving on the Board attended 75% or more of the meetings held during such year by the Board. The Company encourages the attendance of all directors at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.

Nominations for Director are made by the Board of Directors as a whole. The Board determines the desired skills and characteristics for directors as well as the composition of the Board of Directors as a whole. This assessment considers the directors’ qualifications and independence, as well as diversity, age, skill and experience in the context of the needs of the Board of Directors. At a minimum, directors should share the values of the Company and should possess the following characteristics: high personal and professional integrity; the ability to exercise sound business judgment; an inquiring mind; and the time available to devote to Board of Directors’ activities and the willingness to do so. The Board does not have a formal policy specifically focusing on the consideration of diversity; however, diversity is one of the many factors that the Board considers when identifying candidates. In addition to the foregoing considerations, generally with respect to nominees recommended by shareholders, the Board will evaluate such recommended nominees considering the additional information regarding the nominees provided to the Board. When seeking candidates for the Board of Directors, the Board may solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management and third-party search firms. Ultimately, the Board will recommend prospective nominees who the Board believes will be effective, in conjunction with the other members of the Board of Directors, in collectively serving the long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders. The Board will review any candidate recommended by shareholders of the Company in light of its criteria for selection of new directors. See “2015 Stockholder Proposals or Nominations.”

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF SCHNEIDER DOWNS & CO., INC.

The full Board of Directors act as the Audit Committee. The Board currently anticipates appointing Schneider Downs & Co., Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014. For fiscal year 2013, Schneider Downs was engaged by us to audit our annual financial statements. Representatives of Schneider Downs are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board seeks an indication from shareholders of their approval or disapproval of the anticipated appointment of Schneider Downs as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2014 fiscal year. The submission of this matter for approval by shareholders is not legally required, however, the Board believes that the submission is an opportunity for the shareholders to provide feedback to the Board on an important issue of corporate governance. If the shareholders do not approve the appointment of Schneider Downs, the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm will be re-evaluated by the Board but will not require the Board to appoint a different accounting firm. If the shareholders approve the appointment of Schneider Downs, the Board in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. Approval of the proposal to ratify the selection of Schneider Downs as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to be voted on the proposal at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be considered shares of common stock present and entitled to vote on the proposal and will not have a positive or negative effect on the outcome of this proposal, however, there should be no broker non-votes on this proposal because brokers have the discretion to vote uninstructed common shares on this proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends that the Shareholders vote FOR Proposal 2.

PROPOSAL 3: AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE OUR AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

Background

On October 9, 2014, our Board of Directors unanimously approved, subject to shareholder approval, an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation (“Amendment”). The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders approve the Amendment to increase from 102,000,000 to 152,000,000 the number of the Company’s authorized shares. The Company currently has authorized 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, 40,228,123 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 55,323,441 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance upon conversion of notes or exercise of warrants and options as of October 17, 2014. No preferred stock is issued or outstanding as of October 17, 2014. The Board believes that the increase of 50,000,000 in the number of shares of common stock authorized would provide the Company greater flexibility with respect to the Company’s capital structure for such purposes as issuing stock options, additional equity financing, and stock-based acquisitions. The Board of Directors also directed that the Amendment be submitted for approval by the Company’s shareholders as required by Delaware law. A copy of the proposed amendment is included in this proxy statement as Appendix A.

The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote FOR Proposal 3.

Summary

The terms of the additional shares of common stock will be identical to those of the currently outstanding shares of common stock. However, because holders of common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase or subscribe for any unissued stock of the Company, any future issuance of additional shares of common stock will reduce the current shareholders’ percentage ownership interest in the total outstanding shares of common stock. This amendment and the creation of additional shares of authorized common stock will not alter the current number of issued shares. The relative rights and limitations of the shares of common stock will remain unchanged under this amendment.

As of October 17, 2014, a total of 40,228,123 shares of the Company’s currently authorized 100,000,000 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding and 55,323,441 are reserved for issuance upon conversion of notes or exercise of warrants, options and other contractual obligations. The increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock would enable the Company to issue shares from time to time as may be required for proper business purposes, such as issuing stock options, raising additional capital for ongoing operations, business and asset acquisitions, stock splits and dividends, present and future employee benefit programs and other proper corporate purposes.

As of October 17, 2014, in addition to the 40,228,123 shares of common stock outstanding, there are 55,323,441 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon conversion of notes or exercise of warrants, options and other contractual obligations, and an additional 4,448,436 shares of common stock unreserved and available for issuance. If the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation is adopted, 54,448,436 shares of common stock would be authorized, unissued and unreserved. The proposed increase in the authorized number of shares of common stock could have a number of effects on the Company’s shareholders depending upon the exact nature and circumstances of any future issuances of authorized but unissued shares. The Securities and Exchange Commission requires the Company to discuss how an increase in authorized shares could be used to make it more difficult to effect a change in control of the Company. The increase could have an anti-takeover effect, in that additional shares could be issued (within the limits imposed by applicable law) in one or more transactions that could make a change in control or takeover of the Company more difficult. For example, additional shares could be issued by the Company so as to dilute the stock ownership or voting rights of persons seeking to obtain control of the Company, even if the persons seeking to obtain control of the Company offer an above-market premium that is favored by a majority of the independent shareholders. Similarly, the issuance of additional shares to certain persons allied with the Company’s management could have the effect of making it more difficult to remove the Company’s current management by diluting the stock ownership or voting rights of persons seeking to cause such removal. The Company does not have any other provisions in its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws that have material anti-takeover consequences. Additionally, the Company has no plans or proposals to adopt other provisions, or enter into other arrangements, that may have material anti-takeover consequences. The Board of Directors is not aware of any attempt, or contemplated attempt, to acquire control of the Company, and this proposal is not being presented with the intent that it be utilized as a type of anti-takeover device. While the Company has no present plans for the issuance of additional shares of common stock, it desires to have such shares available for future issuances as the business need may arise.

Vote Required for Approval

Approval of this amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation requires approval by a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, any shares not voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Brokers will have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, so broker non-votes will not apply to this proposal.

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED

Background

The 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “EIP”), was first approved by the Board of Directors on January 10, 2014. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the EIP was originally 2,500,000 shares, subject to the adjustment for stock dividends, stock splits, recapitalizations and similar corporate events. On October 9, 2014 the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the EIP to increase by 5,000,000 the number of authorized shares of common stock that may be issued under the EIP to 7,500,000. EIP provides that it shall become effective following its adoption by the Board (which occurred on January 10, 2014 and October 9, 2014), subject to its approval by the Company’s shareholders within 12 months after such adoption by the Board of Directors to the extent then required under Section 422 or 424 of the Code or any other applicable law, or deemed necessary or advisable by the Board. This description of the EIP is subject to and qualified by a copy of the EIP (prior to the amendment to increase the shares available to 7,500,000), which is available at www.sec.gov as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 16, 2014. This filing is also available through the Company’s website www.midwestemissions.com (see “Investors”, “SEC Filings”).

The Board of Directors recommends that the Company’s shareholders vote FOR Proposal 4.

Summary

Federal Tax Consequences

The following summary of the federal income tax consequences applicable to options awarded under the EIP is only a general summary of the applicable provisions of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder as in effect on the date of this proxy statement. The actual federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences to the participant may vary depending upon his or her particular circumstances.

Incentive Stock Options

Issuance of an ISO does not cause recognition of taxable income to the participant and does not provide a deduction to the Company at the time it is granted or exercised. However, the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO over the exercise price is an item of adjustment in computing the alternative minimum taxable income of the participant. If the participant holds the shares received as a result of an exercise of an ISO for at least two years from the date of the grant of the ISO and one year from the date of exercise, then any gain realized on disposition of the shares (generally the amount received in excess of the exercise price) is treated as a long-term capital gain.

If shares acquired on exercise of an ISO are disposed of before expiration of the holding periods described above (i.e., a “Disqualifying Disposition”), the participant will include in income, as compensation for the year of the Disqualifying Disposition, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise of the ISO over the exercise price (or, if less, the excess of the amount realized upon disposition over the exercise price). The gain or loss on the sale of shares acquired under an ISO will be either a long-term or a short-term capital gain and will depend on whether the participant has held the shares for more than one year. If a participant includes amounts in income upon a Disqualifying Disposition, the Company will be entitled to a deduction, in the year of such a disposition, for the amount includible in the participant’s income as compensation.

The participant’s basis in shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO is equal to the exercise price paid, plus any amount the participant includes in income as a result of a Disqualifying Disposition.

If an ISO is exercised by tendering previously owned shares of common stock, the following generally will apply: a number of new shares equal to the number of previously owned shares of common stock tendered will be considered to have been received in a tax-free exchange; the participant’s basis and holding period (except for the Disqualifying Disposition period) for such number of new shares of common stock will be equal to the basis and holding period of the previously owned common shares exchanged. To the extent that the number of shares of common stock received exceeds the number of shares of common stock surrendered, no taxable income will be realized by the participant at that time; such excess shares of common stock will be considered ISO stock with a zero basis; and the holding period of the participant in such shares of common stock will begin on the date such shares of common stock are transferred to the participant. If the shares of common stock surrendered were acquired as the result of the exercise of an ISO and the surrender takes place within two years from the date the ISO relating to the surrendered shares of common stock was granted, or within one year from the date of such exercise, the surrender will result in a Disqualifying Disposition and the participant will realize ordinary income at that time in the amount of the excess, if any, of the fair market value at the time of exercise of the shares of common stock surrendered over the basis of such shares of common stock. If any of the shares of common stock received are disposed of in a Disqualifying Disposition, the participant will be treated as first disposing of the shares of common stock with a zero basis.

Non-qualified Stock Options

The grant of a non-qualified stock option generally results in no recognition of taxable income to the participant or allowance of a deduction to the Company at the time it is granted. A participant exercising such an option will, at that time, recognize taxable income from compensation equal to the excess of the then market value of the shares over the aggregate exercise price. Subject to the applicable provisions of the Code, the Company will be allowed a deduction for federal income tax purposes in the year of exercise in an amount equal to the taxable income recognized by the participant.

The participant’s basis in shares acquired upon exercise of a non-qualified option is equal to the sum of the exercise price plus the amount includible in his or her income upon exercise. Any gain or loss upon subsequent disposition of the shares of common stock will be a long-term or short-term gain or loss, depending upon the holding period of the shares of common stock.

If a non-qualified option is exercised by tendering previously owned shares of common stock, the following generally will apply: a number of new shares of common stock equal to the number of previously owned shares tendered will be considered to have been received in a tax-free exchange; and the participant’s basis and holding period for such number of new shares of common stock will be equal to the basis and holding period of the previously owned shares of common stock exchanged. The participant will have compensation income equal to the fair market value on the date of exercise of the number of new shares of common stock received in excess of such number of exchanged shares of common stock; the participant’s basis in such excess shares of common stock will be equal to the amount of such compensation income; and the holding period in such shares of common stock will begin on the date of exercise.

Restricted Shares

A participant will not recognize any taxable income upon the grant of restricted stock unless the participant makes a voluntary election to recognize income at grant under Section 83(b) of the Code. Upon the expiration of a restriction period for restricted stock, whether such period lapses due to the satisfaction of certain pre-established performance criteria or due solely to the lapse of time, the participant will recognize compensation income and the Company will be entitled to a deduction equal to the value of the restricted stock that the participant receives.

Vote Required for Approval

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy by shareholders represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders is required for approval of the EIP. Broker non-votes will not be treated as votes cast and will not have a positive or negative effect on the outcome of the proposal. Abstentions will be treated as votes cast and, consequently, will have the same effect as votes against the proposal.

PROPOSAL 5: SAY-ON-PAY

Pursuant to the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company provides its shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory non-binding vote to approve the compensation of its Named Executive Officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules (a “say-on-pay proposal”). The Company believes that it is appropriate to seek the views of shareholders on the design and effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program.

The Company’s goal for its executive compensation program is to attract, motivate, and retain a talented, entrepreneurial and creative team of executives who will provide leadership for the Company’s success in competitive markets. The Company seeks to accomplish this goal in a way that rewards performance and is aligned with its shareholders’ long-term interests.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote for the following resolution:

Because the vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. The Board values the opinions of our shareholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented by proxy and voting at the annual meeting will constitute approval of this non-binding resolution. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be considered shares of common stock present and entitled to vote on this proposal and will not have a positive or negative effect on the outcome of the proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote FOR Proposal 5.

PROPOSAL 6: SAY ON PAY FREQUENCY

Rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act also require the Company to seek a non-binding advisory shareholder vote every six years regarding the frequency (annually, every other year, or every three years) at which the Company will ask its shareholders to provide the advisory vote on executive compensation.

After careful consideration, the Board recommends that future advisory votes on executive compensation occur every year because the Board believes it is important to hear from its shareholders frequently regarding its compensation practices and philosophy.

As an advisory vote this proposal is non-binding. The Board values the opinions of our shareholders and understands that executive compensation is an important matter, and they will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions on the frequency of the Company’s executive compensation advisory votes.

Shareholders may cast their votes in favor of one year, two years or three years or abstain from voting on the proposal. The choice selected by the greatest number of votes will be deemed the shareholders’ choice on the frequency of the Company’s executive compensation advisory vote. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote for ONE YEAR on Proposal 6.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The full Board of Directors act as the Audit Committee. In this report, references to the Committee shall be deemed references to the full Board of Directors. Only one director, Mr. Greenberg, is independent under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Committee’s responsibilities include oversight of the Company’s independent auditors as well as oversight of management’s conduct in the Company’s financial reporting process. The Committee also approves the Company’s retention of independent auditors and pre-approves any audit or non-audit services performed by them. Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and issuing a report thereon. For fiscal 2013, the Committee has met and discussed with management and the independent auditors the fair and complete presentation of the Company’s financial statements. The Committee has also discussed and reviewed with the independent auditors all communications required by GAAP, including those described in Auditing Standards No. 16, “Communication with Audit Committees”, as adopted by the PCAOB. The Committee has discussed significant accounting policies applied in the financial statements, as well as alternative treatments. Management has represented that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company’s independent auditors also provided to the Committee the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communication with the Committee concerning independence. The Committee discussed with the independent auditors their firm’s independence.

Based on the Committee’s discussion with Management and the independent auditors and the report of the independent auditors to the Committee, the Board of Directors included the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Johnny F. Norris, Jr 

Richard A. MacPherson 

Jay Rifkin 

R. Alan Kelley 

Christopher Greenberg

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FEES

The aggregate audit fees billed to the Company by the Company’s independent auditors, Schneider Downs & Co., Inc., were $62,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $60,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with the preparation of our tax returns and other tax compliance services were $11,400 and $10,275 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. There were no audit-related or other fees paid to our independent auditors for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares as of September 1, 2014, by: (a) our directors and nominees for election as directors; (b) each other person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common shares; (c) the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table; and (d) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. The percentages in the table are calculated on the basis of the amount of outstanding securities plus securities deemed outstanding pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act.

According to the Schedule 13D, the Reporting Persons have shared voting and dispositive power of the 22,660,600 shares set forth above. The address for the Reporting Persons is 15 River Road, Suite 230, Wilton CT, 06897.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth for each of the Company’s last two fiscal years the compensation for the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and each of the Company’s other two most highly compensated officers: 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END

The following table sets forth certain information about the number of unexercised nonqualified stock options and unearned stock awards held as of December 31, 2013 by each director and executive named in the Summary Compensation Table. There were no stock options exercised during fiscal 2013.

Unexercised Options and Stock Grants

Retirement and Savings Plan - 401(k)

Since November 1, 2011, the Company has maintained a Retirement and Savings Plan under IRS Code Section 401(k) (“the 401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation before federal income tax to a qualified trust. All employees who are at least 21 years of age are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. The participants may choose from nineteen investment options for the investment of their deferred compensation. In addition, the Company matches 100% of each participant’s salary deferral, for the first 4% of their salary, with a cash contribution. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company contributed $16,200 to the 401(k) Plan.

Director Compensation

Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation as directors. On January 10, 2012, the Company agreed to a consulting agreement with Eastern Emissions Consultants Incorporated (“EECI”), a firm that Richard A. MacPherson is the controlling principal and President. The contracts calls for monthly payments of $15,000 to EECI, was effective as of November 1, 2011 and has a term of three years. The Company paid EECI, $180,000 for consulting services in 2012 and $30,000 for consulting services in 2013. $150,000 was unpaid as of December 31, 2013. No other compensation was paid to Directors in the year ended December 31, 2013.

2015 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS OR NOMINATIONS

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, some stockholder proposals may be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s 2015 proxy statement. Any stockholder proposal under Rule 14a-8 must be submitted, along with proof of ownership of the Company’s stock in accordance with Rule 14a-8(b)(2), to the Company’s principal executive offices in care of the Company’s Secretary by letter to 500 W. Wilson Bridge Rd., Suite 140, Columbus, Ohio, 43085. Failure to deliver a proposal in accordance with this procedure may result in the proposal not being deemed timely received. The Company must receive all submissions no later than the close of business (5:00 p.m. Eastern Time) on June 19, 2015. The Company encourages any stockholder interested in submitting a proposal to contact the Company’s Secretary in advance of this deadline to discuss the proposal, and stockholders may find it helpful to consult knowledgeable counsel with regard to the detailed requirements of applicable securities laws. Submitting a stockholder proposal does not guarantee that we will include it in the Company’s proxy statement. The Board of Directors reviews all stockholder proposals and will take appropriate action on such proposals. If the 2015 annual meeting is held more than 30 days from the anniversary of the 2014 Annual Meeting, the Company will make appropriate disclosure in a Form 10-Q setting forth the revised deadline for stockholder proposals pursuant to Rule 14a-8.

In addition, under the Company’s Bylaws, any stockholder who intends to nominate a candidate for election to the Board or to propose any business at the Company’s 2015 annual meeting, other than precatory (non-binding) proposals presented under Rule 14a-8, must give notice to the Company’s Secretary between June 19, 2015 and the close of business on September 12, 2015. The notice must include information specified in the Company’s Bylaws, including information concerning the nominee or proposal, as the case may be, and information about the stockholder’s ownership of, and agreements related to, the Company’s stock. If the 2015 annual meeting is held more than 30 days from the anniversary of the 2014 Annual Meeting, the stockholder must submit notice of any such nomination and of any such proposal that is not made pursuant to Rule 14a-8 by the later of the 60th day before the 2015 annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which the date of such meeting is first publicly announced. The Company will not entertain any proposals or nominations at the annual meeting that do not meet the requirements set forth in the Company’s Bylaws. Also, if the stockholder does not also comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-4(c)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company’s proxies may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies that Company’s Board of Directors solicits to vote in accordance with their best judgment on any such stockholder proposal or nomination. The Bylaws are available on the SEC’s website attached as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 16, 2014. To make a submission or to request a copy of the Company’s Bylaws, stockholders should contact the Company’s Secretary at the address listed above. Again, the Company encourages stockholders to seek advice from knowledgeable counsel before submitting a proposal or a nomination.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and owners of more than ten percent of the Company’s Common Shares (“10% stockholders”), to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Shares of the Company. Executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file pursuant to Section 16(a).

To the Company’s knowledge, based on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company, and with respect to the officers and directors, representations that no other reports were required, during the year ended December 31, 2013, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders were complied with.

EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION

The cost of the solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by regular employees of the Company, either personally or by telephone. The Company does not expect to pay any compensation for the solicitation of proxies, but it may reimburse brokers and other persons holding shares in their names or in the names of nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to beneficial owners and obtaining proxies from such owners.

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

Shareholders may communicate with Board members by addressing a letter to the Secretary of the Company at 500 W. Wilson Bridge Rd., Suite 140, Columbus, Ohio 43085.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors is not aware of any matter to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than that shown in this document. Should any other matters be properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting, the enclosed proxy confers upon the proxy holders named therein the authority to vote on such matters in accordance with their judgment.

Appendix A

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

MIDWEST ENERGY EMISSIONS CORP.

____________________________________________________________

We, the undersigned, President and Secretary, respectively, of Midwest Energy Emissions Corp., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

DO HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST: The Corporation is currently authorized to issue two classes of stock. The total number of shares of stock of each class which the Corporation is authorized to issue and the par value of each share of each class of stock are as follows:

SECOND: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. held on October 9, 2014, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said Corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof numbered “Fourth” so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:

FOURTH: The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock. One class of stock shall be Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The second class of stock shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The Preferred Stock, or any series thereof, shall have such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as shall be expressed in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such stock adopted by the Board of Directors and may be made dependent upon facts ascertainable outside such resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, provided that the matter in which such facts shall operate upon such designations, preferences, rights and qualifications; limitations or restrictions of such class or series of stock is clearly and expressly set forth in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such stock by the Board of Directors.

The total number of shares of stock of each class which the Corporation shall have authority to issue and the par value of each share of each class of stock are as follows:

THIRD: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a meeting of the stockholders of said Corporation was duly called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

FOURTH: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be duly executed this _____ day of _____________, 2014. 

23